Login Register

Access the GIFSQ Portal

Select your user type to log in or register a new account.

Student Portal

Access your food safety courses and exams.

Instructor Portal

Manage courses, view student submissions, and grade quizzes.

Company Portal

Manage corporate setup, view employee logs, and access QA services.

Home / Resources / Tools Hub / Reproducibility Study Analyzer

Reproducibility Study Analyzer

Interactive Tool Free Resource

GIFSQ Tools · Module 15 — Metrology, Validation & Laboratory Accreditation · Tool 289 of 500

Analyse reproducibility across laboratories: between-laboratory standard deviation, reproducibility standard deviation sᵣ and the reproducibility limit R of ISO 5725.

Try sample values — fills the form with the worked example below.

–
Between-lab SD (sᴸ)
–
Reproducibility SD (sᵣ)
–
Reproducibility limit (R)
–
Reproducibility RSD (%)
Equation: sᴸ = SD of the laboratory means (n − 1). sᵣ = √(sᴸ² + sᵣ²). Reproducibility limit R = 2.8 × sᵣ. Reproducibility RSD (%) = sᵣ ÷ grand mean × 100.
Method: Reproducibility conditions per ISO 5725-2: the same method applied in different laboratories, by different operators, on different equipment. sᵣ combines the between-laboratory component with the repeatability component.
Assumptions: each laboratory mean is based on the same number of replicates; the laboratories are a representative sample; results are approximately normally distributed.
Limitations: with few laboratories the between-lab estimate is imprecise; an outlying laboratory inflates sᴸ — screen with Grubbs or Cochran tests before pooling.
Rounding: sᴸ, sᵣ and R to 3 decimal places; reproducibility RSD to 2 decimal places; intermediates unrounded.
This is a calculation aid, not a laboratory report — confirm against your accredited method before citing a value.
Worked example: Laboratory means 10.2, 10.5, 10.1, 10.4, 10.3 mg/kg with sᵣ = 0.10 mg/kg: sᴸ = 0.158, sᵣ = √(0.025 + 0.01) = 0.187, R = 0.524, reproducibility RSD = 1.82%.

Enter values above to see results.

Results from two laboratories should not differ by more than R in about 19 cases out of 20 when the method is in control. Tool 289 of 500 — GIFSQ