Login Register

Access the GIFSQ Portal

Select your user type to log in or register a new account.

Student Portal

Access your food safety courses and exams.

Instructor Portal

Manage courses, view student submissions, and grade quizzes.

Company Portal

Manage corporate setup, view employee logs, and access QA services.

Expert Witness & Technical Due Diligence

Expert Witness & Technical Due Diligence

Forensic Food Diagnostics, Legal Advisory
& M&A Technical Auditing Programs

01
Expert Witness & Regulatory Evidence

Technical Assessments

Compile authoritative technical assessments and scientific position papers for litigation or regulatory disputes. We evaluate complex food science, thermal calculations, and microbiological reports to build robust evidence.

02
Acquisition Technical Auditing

Facility Due Diligence

Conduct comprehensive pre-acquisition facility audits. We assess structural integrity, process flows, equipment condition, capacity limitations, and sanitary design risks to determine operational feasibility.

03
Forensic Contamination Diagnostics

Food Safety Investigations

Lead investigations into foodborne outbreaks, product recalls, or persistent facility pathogens. We implement genetic typing review, spatial mapping of pathogens, and environmental monitoring root cause analysis.

04
Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

Product Failure Investigations

Diagnose chemical and physical food defects (off-flavors, packaging failures, premature spoilage, stability drops). We use forensic food chemistry to isolate contamination roots.

05
Regulatory & Litigation Support

Expert Technical Reviews

Review opposing witness testimonies, laboratory reports, and regulatory citation files. We provide independent technical audits to guide legal strategy during food law disputes.

06
M&A Technical Due Diligence

Acquisition Technical Reviews

Analyze corporate target assets for mergers and acquisitions. We audit training histories, recall statistics, food safety records, and CAPA metrics to outline technical liabilities.

How this service works

Who this is for

Parties in a food safety dispute or regulatory matter, and acquirers checking a target before a deal.

What you receive

  • A technical assessment or scientific position paper for litigation or a regulatory dispute
  • A pre-acquisition facility due diligence audit covering structure, process flows, equipment condition, capacity and sanitary design risks
  • A food safety investigation into a foodborne outbreak, recall or persistent facility pathogen
  • A product failure investigation diagnosing chemical and physical defects such as off flavours, packaging failure, premature spoilage and stability drops
  • An expert technical review of opposing witness testimony, laboratory reports and regulatory citation files
  • An acquisition technical review auditing training histories, recall statistics, food safety records and corrective action metrics

How an engagement runs

Every engagement runs the same way: assess, build, verify, and hand over a system your own team can operate.

How to request a consultation

When you contact us, tell us where it hurts: an audit date, a buyer requirement, or a product that will not hold its shelf life. Book a consultation or send your request through the contact form.

Ready to strengthen your expert witness & technical due diligence?

Talk to our specialists for a practical, no-obligation assessment of where you stand and what comes next.

Request a Quote

What a strong technical case file looks like

A technical case file stands or falls on separation between fact and opinion. Facts are the laboratory reports, thermal calculations, and process records, each tied to its method and date. Opinion is the expert's reading of what those facts mean for the dispute. When the two are kept apart and every opinion points back to a named document, the file survives cross-examination far better than a narrative that blends them.

When to bring in technical support

Early beats late. An expert brought in before positions harden can still request missing records, witness testing, and shape the questions asked. Late instruction limits the work to reviewing whatever documents already exist, which narrows every conclusion that follows.