GIFSQ Tools · Module 13 — HACCP, Food Safety & Regulatory Compliance · Tool 241 of 500
Score how complete a HACCP plan is: hazard-analysis coverage across process steps, CCPs with documented critical limits, and prerequisite programmes (PRPs) on file — per the 7 HACCP principles.
Try sample values — fills the form with the worked example below.
Saved on this device only.
| Date | Result |
|---|---|
| No saved results yet. | |
–
Hazard-analysis coverage (%)
–
CCPs with limits (%)
–
Overall completeness (%)
Equation: Coverage (%) = steps analysed ÷ total steps × 100. CCPs with limits (%) = CCPs with limits ÷ total CCPs × 100. PRPs documented (%) = PRPs documented ÷ total PRPs × 100. Overall (%) = (coverage + CCPs with limits + PRPs documented) ÷ 3.
Method: HACCP plan completeness against the 7 HACCP principles and 12 application steps in Codex CAC/RCP 1-1969 (Rev. 2020), General Principles of Food Hygiene, Annex: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) System. ISO 22000:2018 clause 8.5 covers the same plan elements for a food safety management system.
Assumptions: the step count is the full flow diagram; a CCP with no documented critical limit counts as undocumented; a PRP with no written procedure counts as undocumented.
Limitations: a completeness score is not a validation — a plan can score 100% and still have the wrong hazards or limits; validation and verification are separate HACCP principles (6 and 7).
Rounding: percentages to 2 decimal places; intermediates unrounded.
This is a calculation aid, not a laboratory report — confirm against your accredited method before citing a value.
Method: HACCP plan completeness against the 7 HACCP principles and 12 application steps in Codex CAC/RCP 1-1969 (Rev. 2020), General Principles of Food Hygiene, Annex: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) System. ISO 22000:2018 clause 8.5 covers the same plan elements for a food safety management system.
Assumptions: the step count is the full flow diagram; a CCP with no documented critical limit counts as undocumented; a PRP with no written procedure counts as undocumented.
Limitations: a completeness score is not a validation — a plan can score 100% and still have the wrong hazards or limits; validation and verification are separate HACCP principles (6 and 7).
Rounding: percentages to 2 decimal places; intermediates unrounded.
This is a calculation aid, not a laboratory report — confirm against your accredited method before citing a value.
Worked example: A plan with 12 steps all analysed, 4 CCPs all with limits, and 9 of 10 PRPs documented: coverage 100.00%, CCPs with limits 100.00%, PRPs 90.00%, overall 96.67%.
Enter values above to see results.
A plan is complete only when every step has a hazard analysis and every CCP has a critical limit — anything less is a gap to close before the next audit. Saved on this device only. Tool 241 of 500 — GIFSQ
