Login Register

Access the GIFSQ Portal

Select your user type to log in or register a new account.

Student Portal

Access your food safety courses, certifications, and exams.

Instructor Portal

Manage courses, view student submissions, and grade quizzes.

Company Portal

Manage corporate setup, view employee logs, and access QA services.

SOP: Testing Paired Preference by the Chi-Square Test

GIFSQ — Global Institute for Food Safety & Quality

Principle

In a paired comparison test the null hypothesis presupposes that there is no real difference between the two samples, so the responses should be equally divided between the two categories. The chi-square (χ²) test compares the observed frequencies with the expected frequencies; a large χ² value means the preference is significant and not due to chance.

Materials

  • The observed number of preferences for each of the two samples
  • The expected frequencies under the null hypothesis (equal division)

Procedure

Carry out the paired comparison test and count the observed frequencies O for each sample

↓

Set the expected frequency E for each sample as the total number of responses divided equally between the two categories

↓

Compute the χ² value using the expression below (degrees of freedom = 1 for two categories)

↓

Compare the calculated χ² with the tabulated chi-square value for 1 degree of freedom and judge the significance

Calculation

χ² = Σ[(O − E)² / E]

Where,

  • O = frequency observed
  • E = frequency expected
  • χ² has 1 degree of freedom for two categories

Worked example — preference for two jams

To determine which of two samples of jam (No. 1 or No. 2) is preferred, a paired comparison test was carried out. Jam No. 1 was preferred 17 times and No. 2 was preferred 7 times. The number expected according to the null hypothesis is 12 for each.

χ² = (17 − 12)²/12 + (7 − 12)²/12 = 25/12 + 25/12 = 4.17

With one degree of freedom, a χ² of 4.17 is to be expected only about 2.5% of the time (as printed); hence the result is significant at that level and jam No. 1 is genuinely preferred.

Note: the book’s “about 2.5% of the time” recomputes to about 4.1% (two-sided p = 0.041 for χ² = 4.17 at df = 1); the result is still significant at the 5% level, since χ² = 4.17 exceeds the 5% critical value of 3.84.

Precautions

  • The null hypothesis presupposes no real difference between the samples, so the expected frequencies are equal in the two categories.
  • The test applies to the frequencies of responses, not to the means of measurements.

References

Ranganna, S., Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products, 2nd edition.